What Does ‘Use In Commerce’ Mean For a Trademark?
What is the Definition of Use in Commerce? The definition of use in commerce with regards to trademarks is found in 15 USC 1127:
Mark. The term “mark” includes any trademark, service mark, collective mark, or certification mark. Use in commerce. The term “use in commerce” means the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. For purposes of this chapter, a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce—
(1) on goods [products] when—
(A) it is placed in any manner on the goods or their containers or the displays associated therewith or on the tags or labels affixed thereto, or if the nature of the goods makes such placement impracticable, then on documents associated with the goods or their sale, and
(B) the goods are sold or transported in commerce, and
(2) on services when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services.
* Note: ‘Use in commerce’ may have different meanings with regards to liability than it does with regards to gaining rights for registration. See Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc., 562 F. 3d 123 (2nd Cir. 2009). A restrictive definition of "use in commerce" as set forth in §45 defines standards of qualification for an owner to register a mark and receive the benefits and protection of the Trademark Act. These standards are not the same definitions as used for determining liability.
Does Registering For a URL (domain name) Using My Trademark Qualify As A Use In Commerce? Just using a name as a domain name is not a trademark use.
TMEP §1215.02: A mark composed of a domain name is registrable as a trademark or service mark only if it functions as a source identifier. The mark, as depicted on the specimen, must be presented in a manner that will be perceived by potential purchasers to indicate source and not as merely an informational indication of the domain name address used to access a website. See In re Roberts, 87 USPQ2d 1474, 1479 (TTAB 2008) (finding that irestmycase did not function as a mark for legal services, where it is used only as part of an address by means of which one may reach applicant’s website, or along with applicant’s other contact information on letterhead); In re Eilberg, 49 USPQ2d 1955, 1957 (TTAB 1998).
Is the Date That I Registered My Domain Name My First Use in Commerce? Only if your web site is also using the domain name as a trademark in a valid manner already. Web pages that do not show a proper use in commerce are common refusals as specimen refusals.
Does My Letterhead Count as a Use In Commerce? Maybe, depending on use. If the letterhead just identifies the trade name (business entity), it may not function as a use in commerce. Excerpt from TMEP §1202.01: In re Diamond Hill Farms, 32 USPQ2d 1383 (TTAB 1994). DIAMOND HILL FARMS, as used on containers for goods, found to be a trade name that identifies applicant as a business entity rather than a mark that identifies applicant’s goods and distinguishes them from those of others.
Trademark Use In Commerce [filing basis 1a] Must Be Open and Public (and not just in the planning-
"Mere adoption (selection) of a mark accompanied by preparations to begin its use are insufficient . . . for claiming ownership of and applying to register the mark. “At the very least," in order for an applicant to meet the use requirement, "there must be an open and notorious public offering of the services to those for whom the services are intended." Aycock Engineering, Inc. v. Airflite, Inc., 560 F. 3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2009). (internal citations omitted)
Is having my trademark on a business plan a use in commerce? [A] mark is not "used" when it is presented to a potential customer as part of a business plan; it must be employed in commerce such that it distinguishes the goods or services of a seller from others in the marketplace. McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 16:1 (4th ed. 1996); see also Allard Enters. v. Advanced Programming Res., 249 F.3d 564, 571-
How Do I Show Use In Commerce for My Product? Specimens on Labels, Containers or Displays Show Use In Commerce for Trademarks (goods or products).
According to the TMEP, "a label is an acceptable specimen" where the mark "is applied to the goods or the containers for the goods," even by shipping or mailing labels. § 904.03(a). On containers, "a showing of the trademark on the normal commercial package for the particular goods is an acceptable specimen." § 904.03(c). Thus, a product box that bears the trademark, but does not display a picture of the goods or allow customers to see the goods, may be an acceptable specimen. "Solid products have greater flexibility, inasmuch as the mark may be impressed directly on them during the manufacturing process. Of course, use on their containers or associated displays is equally acceptable.". As to displays associated with goods, the Board has found that a display bearing a trademark for chemicals at a trade show booth was an adequate specimen, even though the chemicals were not present or visible at the booth. . . Thus, tangible specimens—whether labels, containers, or displays—can show use in commerce by describing the goods in sufficient detail in relation to the marks. (internal citations omitted)
In re Sones, 590 F. 3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
How Do I Show a Use In Commerce for My Services? Acceptable specimens for services normally consist of advertisements, displays, or signage (TMEP 1301). A service mark specimen must show use of the mark “in the sale or advertising of services.” Trademark Act Section 45, 15 U.S.C. §1127; 37 C.F.R. §2.56. Therefore, a specimen is unacceptable if it does not show use of the service mark in relation to the identified services. There must be a direct association between the mark sought to be registered and the services specified in the application, with sufficient reference to the services in the specimen to create this association. In re Monograms America, Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1317 (TTAB 1999); In re Adair, 45 USPQ2d 1211 (TTAB 1997); In re Restonic Corp., 189 USPQ 248 (TTAB 1975); TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.
Are There Other Ways Use In Commerce Can Be Accomplished? Use In Commerce for Goods Can Be Established Is By Transportation.
The requirement for public awareness of the mark is a consistent theme. "The use in commerce required for obtaining a federal registration is generally congruous with the required use of a mark for obtaining ownership under the common law.... Transportation in commerce generally constitutes a `use' without a sale as long as the use is `open and notorious' and before potential customers." Societe de Developments et D'Innovations des Marches Agricoles et Alimentaires-
Gen. Healthcare Ltd. v. Qashat, 254 F.Supp.2d 193, 198 (D.Mass.2003)
My Business is Just Starting Up and We Are Not Making Much Money Yet. Does That Qualify As A Use In Commerce? Trademark Use in Commerce is Not Limited to Profitable Enterprises.
Slow commercial progress, or absence of income or profit, is not a ground of cancellation of registration. Use in commerce under the Lanham Act is not limited to profit-
If A Trademark is Abandoned, Can I Start Using It? Lack of Use in Commerce (nonuse for three years with no intent to resume) Results in Abandonment of a Mark Leaving Room For Another to Use the Mark. [Note that the word ‘Abandoned’ in this context actually means NOT IN USE rather than an application or registration being DEAD which is a failure to have an active registration.]
"An intent to resume use of the mark formulated after more than three years of non-
Once a mark is abandoned, it enters the public domain and another party can appropriate it. Indianapolis Colts, Inc. v. Metro. Baltimore Football Club Ltd. P'ship, 34 F.3d 410, 412 (7th Cir. 1994). With no other parties using a mark, the new user becomes the senior user of the mark. "It is axiomatic in trademark law that the standard test of ownership is priority of use." Sengoku Works v. RMC Int'l, 96 F.3d 1217, 1219 (9th Cir. 1996).
See Specht v. Google Inc (N.D. Ill., 2010).
→Call us with more questions at 1-
Not Just Patents®
© Not Just Patents LLC, PO Box 18716, Minneapolis, MN 55418, (651) 500-